Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://eevb.net/video/Er2ggsgprFh.html Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Did The Threats Break Amy Coney Barrett? Election Day, Birthright Citizenship & Judicial Terror Ev Charging Points [VbvRKB4JTwp] Health Updated on August 06, 2026 EDT — Published on August 06, 2026 EDT Tag: #Ev Charging Points, #vancouver vs fc dallas, #mj, #daniel yacobiAmy Coney Barrett is asking Congress for more security funding after conservative Supreme Court justicesand their familieshave faced swatting, threats, protests at their homes, and even one piece 1182 an attempted assassination.That raises an uncomfortable question:**Did the intimidation campaign work?**In two of the Courts biggest recent cases, Barrett broke with the conservative wing and joined rulings that produced major victories for the Left.In *Watson v. Republican National Committee*, she helped redefine Election Day as merely the deadline for expressing or mailing a voters intentnot necessarily the deadline for election officials to receive the vote.Then, in *Trump v. Barbara*, she joined the Roberts majority in extending birthright citizenship to the children of illegal and temporary foreign residents, relying heavily on *Wong Kim Ark*a case involving parents who were lawfully present and permanently domiciled in the United States.These were not minor procedural disputes. They involved who votes, when votes count, and who automatically becomes an American citizen.Today, we examine: Barretts sudden departure from her conservative record The swatting and threats aimed at her family The attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh The federal law prohibiting attempts to influence judges outside their homes The strained reasoning behind *Watson* and *Trump v. Barbara* The historical meaning of subject to the jurisdiction thereof Why Democrat-appointed justices vote as a unified political bloc Whether fear, institutional cowardice, or ideological surrender is reshaping the CourtWe cannot prove that Barrett changed st johns her votes because she was terrorized.But when a justice asks Congress for protection immediately after issuing two rulings that reward the political faction responsible for normalizing intimidation, the American people are entitled to ask: **Are we witnessing judicial independenceor evidence that judicial independence has already failed?**### Receipts1. *Watson v. Republican National Committee*2. *Trump v. Barbara*3. 18 U.S.C. 1507 Picketing or parading near a judges residence4. Supreme Court security funding and threats against justices **Click here to support us:** ( **Join us on Rumble:** Tune in daily for a chance to win a free Rumble Premium deandre ayton subscription.
Tag: #Ev Charging Points, #vancouver vs fc dallas, #mj, #daniel yacobiAmy Coney Barrett is asking Congress for more security funding after conservative Supreme Court justicesand their familieshave faced swatting, threats, protests at their homes, and even one piece 1182 an attempted assassination.That raises an uncomfortable question:**Did the intimidation campaign work?**In two of the Courts biggest recent cases, Barrett broke with the conservative wing and joined rulings that produced major victories for the Left.In *Watson v. Republican National Committee*, she helped redefine Election Day as merely the deadline for expressing or mailing a voters intentnot necessarily the deadline for election officials to receive the vote.Then, in *Trump v. Barbara*, she joined the Roberts majority in extending birthright citizenship to the children of illegal and temporary foreign residents, relying heavily on *Wong Kim Ark*a case involving parents who were lawfully present and permanently domiciled in the United States.These were not minor procedural disputes. They involved who votes, when votes count, and who automatically becomes an American citizen.Today, we examine: Barretts sudden departure from her conservative record The swatting and threats aimed at her family The attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh The federal law prohibiting attempts to influence judges outside their homes The strained reasoning behind *Watson* and *Trump v. Barbara* The historical meaning of subject to the jurisdiction thereof Why Democrat-appointed justices vote as a unified political bloc Whether fear, institutional cowardice, or ideological surrender is reshaping the CourtWe cannot prove that Barrett changed st johns her votes because she was terrorized.But when a justice asks Congress for protection immediately after issuing two rulings that reward the political faction responsible for normalizing intimidation, the American people are entitled to ask: **Are we witnessing judicial independenceor evidence that judicial independence has already failed?**### Receipts1. *Watson v. Republican National Committee*2. *Trump v. Barbara*3. 18 U.S.C. 1507 Picketing or parading near a judges residence4. Supreme Court security funding and threats against justices **Click here to support us:** ( **Join us on Rumble:** Tune in daily for a chance to win a free Rumble Premium deandre ayton subscription.